Review for week ending 13/04/00

A very mixed week with some excellent results on the time of the first goal markets being undone by some terrible results in Divison One. The 4-3 goal bonanza in the Barnsley / W.B.A. game together with Man City's 4-0 defeat of Crewe meant that all of the profit from the other bets was wiped out. The total profit for the week came to only �16 which means that the total potential profit for the season is now �20,508 (an average of nearly �700 profit per week).

	A sell of the Home / Away supremacy in the 4 Premiership matches at 1.4 with William Hill Index (Soccer Spreads rating 0.8 - Makeup 0) for �90 per goal would have produced �126 profit.
	A sell of the bookings index in the Bradford / Southampton game at 34 with City Index (Soccer Spreads rating 24.7 - Makeup 30) for �9 per point would have produced �36 profit.
	A buy of the time of the first Bradford goal against Southampton at 51 minutes with William Hill Index (Soccer Spreads rating 59.3 - Makeup 77) for �8 per minute would have produced �208 profit.
	A sell of the time of the first Everton goal against Leicester at 54 minutes with William Hill Index (Soccer Spreads rating 42.8 - Makeup 27) for �10 per minute would have produced �270 profit.
	A sell of the time of the first Wimbledon goal against Sunderland at 63 minutes with William Hill Index (Soccer Spreads rating 51.7 - Makeup 74) for �10 per minute would have produced a loss of �110.
	A buy of the time of the first Derby goal against Watford at 52 minutes with William Hill Index (Soccer Spreads rating 61.2 - Makeup 90) for �8 per minute would have produced �304 profit.
	A sell of the total goals in the 11 Division One matches at 29 with Sporting Index (Soccer Spreads rating 27.90 - Makeup 35) for �90 per goal would have produced a loss of �540.
	A sell of the Man City mini performance against Crewe at 33 with either IG or Sporting Index (Soccer Spreads rating 27.3 - Makeup 60) for �15 per point would have produced a loss of �405.
	A sell of the Q.P.R. mini performance against Swindon at 32 with Sporting Index (Soccer Spreads rating 27.1 - Makeup 35) for �13 per point would have produced a loss of �39.
	A sell of the bookings index in the Middlesboro / Man United game at 34 with City Index (Soccer Spreads rating 23.4 - Makeup 40) for �10 per point would have produced a loss of �60.
	A sell of the bookings index in the Wimbledon / Sheffield Wednesday game at 28 with Sporting Index (Soccer Spreads rating 18.4 - Makeup 0) for �9 per point would have produced �252 profit.
	A sell of the Chelsea mini performance against Coventry at 38 with City Index (Soccer Spreads rating 32.4 - Makeup 40) for �13 per point would have produced a loss of �26.

To view the ratings on which these bets were based please click here

Please note that potential bets are only recorded if the difference between the Soccer Spreads rating and the best spread available is at least a quarter of the spread volatility (e.g. in order to bet on the total corners in a Premiership match the difference between the Soccer Spreads rating and the spread being offered must be at least 0.9). All recorded bets are based on a 'Medium' base unit stake which is then adjusted depending on how much the Soccer Spreads rating disagrees with the spread being offered (for a full explanation see 'How to use Soccer Spreads').

Soccer Spreads, or anyone associated with Soccer Spreads, accept no responsibility whatsoever for any loss that may be sustained by the use (or mis-use) of the Soccer Spreads ratings however that loss might be sustained. Anyone using the Soccer Spreads ratings as a basis to speculate on football matches via spread betting or any other betting medium do so entirely at their own risk. Soccer Spreads ratings are meant as an indication only and subscribers must use their own judgement when deciding whether or not to speculate on any particular situation. Spread betting can be very volatile and subscribers should only speculate with money that they can comfortably afford to lose. It may not be suitable for all investors; therefore subscribers should ensure that the risks involved are fully understood, seeking advice if necessary.